CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR |
| 1:2020cv00221 |
| January 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Proposed Briefing Schedule due by 4/8/2020. (nbn) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.(Field, Brian) |
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the parties shall confer and submit a proposed briefing schedule by April 8, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/25/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 3/25/2020. (nbn) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Field, Brian) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Defendant's #7 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendant shall file its response by March 25, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/3/2020. (lcjeb3)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR served on 2/3/2020. RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 2/3/2020. (Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 3/4/2020.) (See Docket Entry #5 to view document) (ztth) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General February 4, 2020. (Wolf, Douglas) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY . (Wolf, Douglas) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zrdj) |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (Wolf, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6770370) filed by CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons U.S. Department of the Interior)(Wolf, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR | |
| Represented By: | Brian J. Field |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Wakefield Wolf |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
