THOMPSON v. DELBECQ et al
| ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON |
| MIREILLE DELBECQ and YAHOO! INCORPORATED |
| 1:2020cv00255 |
| January 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ORDERED that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to issue summons #4 is DENIED. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/6/2020. (zmd)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/6/2020. (zmd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Issue Summons by ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON. (zmd) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIREILLE DELBECQ, YAHOO! INCORPORATED with Jury Demand filed by ORAL GEORGE THOMPSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 001, #2 Exhibit 002, #3 Exhibit 003) (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 1/30/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
