WEBSTER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BRIAN WEBSTER |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2020cv00300 |
February 4, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
John D Bates |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 REPLY to opposition to motion re #15 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Jackson, David) |
Filing 18 Memorandum in opposition to re #15 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by BRIAN WEBSTER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Walter, Judith) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to BRIAN WEBSTER. Attorney Douglas James Wood terminated. (Wood, Douglas) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to #12 Amended Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Jackson, David) |
Filing 15 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Jackson, David) |
Filing 14 Memorandum in opposition to re #3 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by BRIAN WEBSTER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Walter, Judith) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Order Nunc Pro Tunc by BRIAN WEBSTER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Internal Error from February 25, 2020, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B: Internal Error from February 26, 2020, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C: Internal Error from February 27, 2020, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Walter, Judith) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA with Jury Demand filed by BRIAN WEBSTER. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Redline Version)(Walter, Judith) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Judith L. Walter on behalf of BRIAN WEBSTER (Walter, Judith) |
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of #13 plaintiff's consent motion for order nunc pro tunc, and the entire record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED nunc pro tunc that plaintiff's response to defendant's motion for partial dismissal is due by not later than February 27, 2020. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 02/27/2020. (lcjdb2) |
Filing 10 ENTERED IN ERROR. . . . .RESPONSE re #3 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by BRIAN WEBSTER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Wood, Douglas) Modified on 2/25/2020 (ztd). |
Filing 9 ENTERED IN ERROR. . . . .AMENDED COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA with Jury Demand filed by BRIAN WEBSTER. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Redline)(Wood, Douglas) Modified on 2/25/2020 (ztd). |
Filing 8 ENTERED IN ERROR. . . . .NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas James Wood on behalf of BRIAN WEBSTER (Wood, Douglas) Modified on 2/25/2020 (ztd). |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas James Wood on behalf of BRIAN WEBSTER (Wood, Douglas) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #8 Notice of Appearance; emailed to dwood@robertsandwood.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Invalid attorney signature, 2. Please refile document, 3. Counsel must use their own credentials to file. (ztd, ) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #10 Response to motion; emailed to dwood@robertsandwood.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Invalid attorney signature, 2. Please refile document (ztd, ) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #9 Amended Complaint; emailed to dwood@robertsandwood.com, cc'd 3 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Invalid attorney signature, 2. Please refile document, 3. If you are electronically filing, your signature must be on the signature line of the document and vice versa. (ztd, ) |
Filing 6 Receipt on 2/18/2020 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2019 CA 008349 B. (eg) |
Filing 5 Partial ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Jackson, David) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Certificate of Service by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA re #3 Partial MOTION to Dismiss (Jackson, David) |
Filing 3 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jackson, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (zmc) |
Case assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zmc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2019 CA 008349 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A-Documents from Superior Court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jackson, David) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/11/2020) (znmw). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WEBSTER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BRIAN WEBSTER | |
Represented By: | Judith L. Walter |
Represented By: | Douglas James Wood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
Represented By: | David A. Jackson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.