VALLECILLO v. EEMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Rafael VALLECILLO |
EMBASSY OF SOUTH AFRICA and EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA |
1:2020cv00432 |
February 13, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. (ztd) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re Notice of Corrected Docket Entry filed by RAFAEL VALLECILLO. Related document: Notice of Corrected Docket Entry.(Veve, Michael) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #2 Summons Issued Electronically was entered in error and counsel notified to refile correct AO 440 Summons (adh, ) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 2/14/20. (lcrdm1) |
Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to EMBASSY OF SOUTH AFRICA. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) Modified on 2/28/2020 (adh, ). |
Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6829655) filed by Rafael VALLECILLO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Notice and Consent)(Veve, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.