LU v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
QING LU |
C.G. WHITESCARVER, SYDNEY LESTER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2020cv00461 |
February 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Amit P Mehta |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Hearings: Telephonic Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/21/2020 at 11:00 AM Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zjd) |
Filing 13 ORDER. The court will hold an initial scheduling conference telephonically on May 21, 2020, at 11:00 AM. The court will circulate dial-in information to counsel. Should any member of the public or media require access to the hearing, they should reach out to the Courtroom Deputy, Mr. Douyon, at Jean-Claude_Douyon@dcd.uscourts.gov for further instructions. See the attached Order for further details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 04/16/2020. (lcapm2) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SYDNEY LESTER, C.G. WHITESCARVER.(Slover, Elizabeth) |
NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: re #9 Summons Returned Executed was entered in error (Incorrect Event) and will be refiled by the Clerk's Office. (eg) |
Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SYDNEY LESTER served on 2/29/2020, answer due 3/21/2020 (eg) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendants' Response to Complaint due by 4/16/2020. (zjd) |
Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. C.G. WHITESCARVER served on 3/6/2020, answer due 3/27/2020 (Schleicher, David) |
Filing 9 ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. (Schleicher, David) Modified on 3/19/2020 (zeg). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Guyette Hersh on behalf of DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SYDNEY LESTER, C.G. WHITESCARVER (Hersh, Michelle) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SYDNEY LESTER, C.G. WHITESCARVER (Slover, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Grant Slover on behalf of All Defendants (Slover, Elizabeth) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Defendants shall file their Response to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before April 16, 2020. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/16/2020. (lcapm2) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SYDNEY LESTER served on 2/29/2020, answer due 3/21/2020 (Schleicher, David) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 02/25/2020., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 2/25/2020. ( Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 3/17/2020.) (Schleicher, David) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SYDNEY LESTER, C.G. WHITESCARVER. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Complaint filed by QING LU. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by QING LU.(Schleicher, David) |
Case assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6840300) filed by QING LU. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Schleicher, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.