ADAMS v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
DALE B. ADAMS and DALE BRENT ADAMS |
JOHN R. CHAPMAN and UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY |
1:2020cv00479 |
February 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Trevor N McFadden |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS (4) Issued as to JOHN R. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (adh, ) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/31/2020. (lctnm3) |
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zsb) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Deputy Clerk shall assign this case as related to Adams v. CIA, No. 20-cv-377 (TNM). SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 3/30/20.(ah) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DALE B. ADAMS (zmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN R. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY filed by DALE B. ADAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmd) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 2/18/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.