CURRAN v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
RACHEL CURRAN and RACHEL A. CURRAN |
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. |
1:2020cv00492 |
February 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Christopher R Cooper |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela A. Smedley on behalf of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (Smedley, Angela) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Ruling by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Slusky, Lawrence) |
NOTICE OF ERROR re #9 Notice of Change of Address; emailed to lslusky@winston.com, cc'd 2 associated attorneys -- The PDF file you docketed contained errors: 1. Counsel must update information through Pacer. (ztd, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by Lawrence E. Slusky (Slusky, Lawrence) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 2/28/2020. (lccrc1) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Angela A. Smedley, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-6865069. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Slusky, Lawrence) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Consent Motion to Stay: It is hereby ORDERED that all proceedings in this matter are STAYED until the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues a decision on the pending petition to transfer this case and others for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall notify the Court and Plaintiff within five days after a decision on the MDL petition is issued. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint within 21 days after the expiration of the stay. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 2/26/2020. (lccrc1) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Text of Proposed Order)(Slusky, Lawrence) |
Filing 5 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (Slusky, Lawrence) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence E. Slusky on behalf of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. (Slusky, Lawrence) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal (adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Christopher R. Cooper. (adh, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.. Case related to Case No. 18-cv-7354. (adh, ) |
Filing 2 ERRATA to Add Caption with Addresses to Notice of Removal, by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. #1 Notice of Removal filed by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Designation of Related Civil Cases Pending)(Slusky, Lawrence) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2020 CA 000384 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADCDC-6846827 filed by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Slusky, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.