NATT v. WOLF et al
| RAJWINDER SINGH NATT |
| CHAD WOLF, WILLIAM P. BARR, CHRIS FREDERICK, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, KEN CUCCINELLI, STANLEY CROCKETT and KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II |
| 1:2020cv00566 |
| February 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Prisoner Petition: Alien Detainee (Habeas Corpus) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case transferred to the USDC for the Western District of Louisiana, pursuant to the Court Order entered 2/28/2020. Sent to Court via extraction. (ztth) (ztth). |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE FORTHWITH to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. See Order for details. Transfer due by 2/28/2020. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 2/28/2020. (lctjk1)
|
| Receipt on 02/28/2020 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 20-cv-00261 sent by USDC for the Western District of Louisiana. (zsb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian J. Field on behalf of All Defendants (Field, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Emergency MOTION to Stay by RAJWINDER SINGH NATT. (ztth) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 4616102525) filed by RAJWINDER SINGH NATT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - J, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ztth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
