UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THREE HUNDRED THREE VIRTUAL CURRENCY ACCOUNTS et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
THREE HUNDRED THREE VIRTUAL CURRENCY ACCOUNTS, THE DARKSCANDALS.COM DOMAIN, AND THE DARKSCANDALS.CO DOMAIN, DARKSCANDALS.CO DOMAIN, DARKSCANDALS.COM DOMAIN and THREE HUNDRED THREE VIRTUAL CURRENCY ACCOUNTS |
1:2020cv00712 |
March 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Dabney L Friedrich |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1355 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Case directly reassigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich as related. Judge Rudolph Contreras is no longer assigned to the case. (ztnr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Related Case Form by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA #1 Complaint, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Faruqui, Zia) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/13/2020) (ztth). Modified event title on 3/19/2020 (znmw). |
Filing 2 WARRANT for Arrest In Rem Issued Electronically (adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THREE HUNDRED THREE VIRTUAL CURRENCY ACCOUNTS, THE DARKSCANDALS.COM DOMAIN, AND THE DARKSCANDALS.CO DOMAIN (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Search & Seizure Warrant)(Faruqui, Zia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.