AL-AQIDI v. ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC. et al
| DALIA FAKRI AL-AQIDI |
| NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC. and ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC. |
| 1:2020cv00713 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Receipt on 5/5/2020 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number 2019 CA 008458 B. (ztth) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Carlos Andres Uria on behalf of ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC. (Uria, Carlos) |
MINUTE ORDER: At the parties' request in today's telephonic hearing, the Court ORDERS that, in the event no settlement is reached: 1) Their LCvR 16.3 Report is now due by June 19, 2020; and 2) The parties shall return for an initial scheduling conference on June 23, 2020, at 10 a.m. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 4/23/2020. (lcjeb3)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge James E. Boasberg: Telephone Conference held on 4/23/2020. See Minute Order filed on 4/23/2020 for details. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 6/23/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25A before Judge James E. Boasberg. (Court Reporter Lisa Griffith) (nbn) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the hearing set for April 23, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. will go forward via teleconference. The Court will inform counsel of the procedures. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 4/8/2020. (lcjeb3)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 4/23/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25A before Judge James E. Boasberg. (znbn) |
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/23/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25A before Judge James E. Boasberg. (znbn) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: Given the Chief Judge's Order relating to the coronavirus, the Court ORDERS that the hearing in this matter set for April 14, 2020, is VACATED and RESET for April 23, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/16/2020. (lcjeb3)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal,, (adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (adh, ) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: An Initial Scheduling Conference is set for April 14, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 25. The parties shall meet, confer, and submit a joint report pursuant to FRCP 26(f) and Local Rule 16.3. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 3/13/2020. (lcjeb3)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/14/2020 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 25A before Judge James E. Boasberg. (nbn) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC., NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC. (Cuniff, Justin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for D.C., case number 2019 CA 008458 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADCDC-6913507 filed by NEW ALBERTSON'S, INC., ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Superior Court Documents Summons, #3 Superior Court Documents Summons 2, #4 Superior Court Documents Info Sheet, #5 Superior Court Documents Complaint, #6 Superior Court Documents Initial Order, #7 Superior Court Documents Answer, #8 Superior Court Documents Not of Filing of Not of Removal)(Cuniff, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
