AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. TRUMP et al
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT |
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, JARED KUSHNER and DONALD J. TRUMP |
1:2020cv00716 |
March 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Richard J Leon |
Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. § 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT re #10 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant Supplemental Affidavit of Process Server by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT re #9 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant Supplemental Affidavit of Process Server by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT re #8 Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant Supplemental Affidavit of Process Server by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT re #7 Summons Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General Supplemental Affidavit of Process Server by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DONALD J. TRUMP served on 4/8/2020 (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JARED KUSHNER served on 4/8/2020 (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT served on 4/8/2020 (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 4/8/2020. (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/13/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/12/2020. (Sandick, Harry) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/23/2020. (lcrjl2) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Harry Sandick on behalf of AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Sandick, Harry) |
MINUTE ORDER. Upon consideration of #2 Motion for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Harry Sandick is admitted pro hac vice to represent plaintiff American Oversight in this case. SO ORDERED. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. Sig ned by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/18/2020. (lcrjl2) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, JARED KUSHNER, DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (adh, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Harry Sandick, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-6914578. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Harry Sandick, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ruzumna, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, JARED KUSHNER, DONALD J. TRUMP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6914348) filed by AMERICAN OVERSIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons - William P. Barr, United States Attorney General, #4 Summons - Executive Office of the President, #5 Summons - Jared Kushner, #6 Summons - Donald J. Trump, #7 Summons - Timothy Shea, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia)(Ruzumna, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.