MUSE v. POMPEO et al
MUSE and SAHAL SALAH MUSE |
POMPEO, MIKE POMPEO, WILLIAM BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, LARRY ANDRE, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, J. ALEXANDER HAMILTON, CHAD F. WOLF, MARIK STRING, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II and WILLIAM P. BARR |
1:2020cv00734 |
March 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Randolph D Moss |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS (7) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM BARR, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II, MIKE POMPEO, MARIK STRING, CHAD F. WOLF, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 03/16/2020. (lcrdm2, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (zmc) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against LARRY ANDR, WILLIAM BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, J. ALEXANDER HAMILTON, MIKE POMPEO, MARIK STRING, CHAD F. WOLF, CHRISTOPHER WRAY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6921314) filed by SAHAL SALAH MUSE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.