BHATTY v. POMPEO et al
| BHATTY and FAIYKA ROSE BHATTY |
| POMPEO, SEBRON CB TONEY, ROB SILBERSTEIN, MARIK STRING, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, MIKE POMPEO, CHAD WOLF, CATHERINE RODRIGUEZ, PAUL W. JONES, JOHN HOOVER, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II and WILLIAM P. BARR |
| KEN CUCCINELLI and WILLIAM BARR |
| 1:2020cv00735 |
| March 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (12) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM BARR, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II, JOHN HOOVER, PAUL W. JONES, MIKE POMPEO, CATHERINE RODRIGUEZ, ROB SILBERSTEIN, MARIK STRING, SEBRON CB TONEY, CHAD WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc) |
| Case assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (zmc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against WILLIAM BARR, KEN CUCCINELLI, JOHN HOOVER, PAUL W. JONES, MIKE POMPEO, CATHERINE RODRIGUEZ, ROB SILBERSTEIN, MARIK STRING, SEBRON CB TONEY, CHAD WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6921489) filed by FAIYKA ROSE BHATTY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
