ADVANCED SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY et al
| ADVANCED SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS |
| CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2020cv00767 |
| March 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amy Berman Jackson |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. Meet and Confer Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 6/4/2020 at 10:15 AM before Judge Amy Berman Jackson. The parties shall meet, confer, and file a Joint Report pursuant to Local Rule 16.3 by 5/27/2020. Any dates contained in the Report should be expressed as specific dates (month/day/year) rather than as time frames (e.g. "60 days from the entry of the scheduling order"). The parties are directed to contact the Court's Deputy Clerk in the first instance to request the rescheduling of the Telephone Scheduling Conference. The party seeking the change in schedule must first confer with counsel for all other parties and be prepared to provide the Deputy Clerk with proposed mutually agreeable dates. The Court's Deputy Clerk will provide the parties, by separate email, with the dial in telephone number and procedures to allow them access to the call. SO ORDERED. By Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 5/10/2020. (jth)
|
| Filing 10 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (Mervis, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY (Mervis, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.(Mervis, Jeffrey) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by May 8, 2020. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 4/6/2020. (lcabj2)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Order)(Mervis, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ADVANCED SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS (Robbins, Seth) |
| Filing 5 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ADVANCED SPECIALTY CONTRACTORS (Robbins, Seth) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY served on 3/19/2020, answer due 4/9/2020 (Robbins, Seth) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY served on 3/19/2020, answer due 4/9/2020 (Robbins, Seth) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Advanced Specialty Contractors ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-6932826) filed by Advanced Specialty Contractors. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Payment Bond, #2 Exhibit B - Contract, #3 Exhibit C - Notice Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Continental, #6 Summons Liberty)(Robbins, Seth) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
