MILLER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER and HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and MICHAEL J. MADIGAN |
1:2020cv00807 |
March 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 04/30/2020. (zmc) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 Memorandum & Opinion by TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(zsb) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 the plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing this civil action. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 4/7/20. (ms) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 4/7/20. (ms) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER (adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE filed by TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (adh, ) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 3/23/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.