UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYTHEON COMPANY and UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2020cv00824
Filed: March 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Dabney L Friedrich
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2020 Filing 11 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Mackowski, Martin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Damian G. Didden by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Mackowski, Martin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan L. Wolf by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Mackowski, Martin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Shawn R. Johnson by UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Mackowski, Martin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Martin J. Mackowski on behalf of UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Mackowski, Martin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Certification Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 16(g) by RAYTHEON COMPANY (Gris, Benjamin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 5 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by RAYTHEON COMPANY (Gris, Benjamin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- David A. Higbee, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number DCDC-6960591. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by RAYTHEON COMPANY (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gris, Benjamin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Gris on behalf of RAYTHEON COMPANY (Gris, Benjamin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF TUNNEY ACT REQUIREMENTS by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Asset Preservation and Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Final Judgment)(Quin, Kevin)
March 26, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Quin, Kevin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAYTHEON COMPANY
Represented By: Benjamin Gris
Represented By: David Higbee
Represented By: Ryan O'Shea Leske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Represented By: Martin J. Mackowski
Represented By: Megan Louise Wolf
Represented By: Damian G. Didden
Represented By: Shawn R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Kevin Connell Quin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?