MEDINA v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
OMAR ALEJANDRO MEDINA |
California State Lottery and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2020cv00896 |
April 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Tanya S Chutkan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED - Omar Alejandro Medina; Letters. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. (zjd) |
|
Filing 7 Receipt on 5/1/2020 of ORIGINAL FILE, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet from Superior Court. Superior Court Number Case 2020 CA 001496 B. (ztd) |
|
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/28/20. (DJS) |
|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 4/24/2020. (tb) |
|
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Complaint by UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Gonzalez, Brenda) Modified on 4/10/2020 (ztd). |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. (zsb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the District of Columbia, case number 2020 CA 001496 B (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gonzalez, Brenda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.