SAHANDI et al v. POMPEO
| Sara Sahandi and Reza Mohammadi |
| MICHAEL R. POMPEO |
| 1:2020cv00945 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Richard J Leon |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0555 b |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 5/7/20. (lcrjl1)
|
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MICHAEL R. POMPEO served on 4/15/2020, RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 04/14/2020., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/15/2020. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/14/2020.) (Morrison, Curtis) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to MICHAEL R. POMPEO. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for injunctive relief and for write of mandamus against MICHAEL R. POMPEO ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7008445) filed by Sara Sahandi, Reza Mohammadi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Morrison, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
