GRAY v. MCPHERSON
| STANLEY G. GRAY |
| Honorable James E. McPherson and JAMES E. MCPHERSON |
| 1:2020cv01025 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Doctor on behalf of STANLEY G. GRAY (Doctor, Vincent) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JAMES E. MCPHERSON served on 5/26/2020 (Eaton, Miguel) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/13/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/12/2020. (Eaton, Miguel) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 05/19/2020. (Eaton, Miguel) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Vincent Doctor is hereby admitted pro hac vice in this matter. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 5/26/2020. (lcegs2) Modified on 5/26/2020 (lcegs2).
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Vincent Doctor, Fee Status: No Fee Paid. by STANLEY G. GRAY (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Eaton, Miguel) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 5/13/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 7/12/2020. (Eaton, Miguel) |
| Filing 5 ENTERED IN ERROR.....RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General WILLIAM BARR. (Eaton, Miguel) Modified on 5/22/2020 (zjf). |
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #5 Summons Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General was entered in error at the request of counsel and will refile with proper proof of service. (zjf) |
| Payment for #7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Vincent Doctor, Fee Status: No Fee Paid.. ($100; Receipt number ADCDC-7153025). (Eaton, Miguel) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 05/13/20. (Attachment: Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to JAMES E. MCPHERSON, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (zsb) |
| Payment for #1 Complaint,. ($400; Receipt number ADCDC-7092409). (Eaton, Miguel) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA COMPLAINT by STANLEY G. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Eaton, Miguel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James E. McPherson Acting Secretary of the Navy Department of the Navy (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by STANLEY G. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Eaton, Miguel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
