BERNIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
JEAN BERNIER |
DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2020cv01250 |
May 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Case transferred to the USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, pursuant to the Court Order entered 05/21/2020. Sent to Court via electronically. (zsb) |
Receipt on 06/12/2020 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 3:20-cv-00956 sent by USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. (zsb) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 6/10/2020. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on 05/21/2020. (zsb) |
Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by JEAN BERNIER (zsb) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JEAN BERNIER (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA filed by JEAN BERNIER.(zsb) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 05/11/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.