FARHADI v. POMPEO et al
| MEHRNOUSH FARHADI |
| MIKE POMPEO, PHILIP FRAYNE, STEVEN C. BONDY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, WILLIAM P. BARR, CHAD F. WOLF, MARIK STRING and CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY |
| 1:2020cv01280 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Beryl A Howell |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or Otherwise Respond by STEVEN C. BONDY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, PHILIP FRAYNE, MIKE POMPEO, MARIK STRING, CHAD F. WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY (Tepe, Sean) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on May 15, 2020. (lcbah3)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (9) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, STEVEN C. BONDY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, PHILIP FRAYNE, MIKE POMPEO, MARIK STRING, CHAD F. WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7126416) filed by MEHRNOUSH FARHADI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
