YATES v. SAUL
| DARVIN YATES |
| ANDREW SAUL |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2020cv01449 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| John D Bates |
| Deborah A Robinson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to ANDREW SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General sent to the U.S. Marshals Service. (zsb) |
| CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson for fullcase management up to and excluding trial. (zsb) |
Filing 3
ORDER referring case to a Magistrate Judge. See text of Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/8/2020. (lcjdb1)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (adh, ) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP #2 is hereby GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign this action randomly to a judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 6/5/2020. (dm)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DARVIN YATES (zmc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW SAUL filed by DARVIN YATES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(zmc) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 06/01/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
