CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY v. TRUMP
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP
Case Number: 1:2020cv01456
Filed: June 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Trevor N McFadden
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2020 Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's proof of service due by 8/31/2020. (hmc)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER. The Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on June 2, 2020. As of the date of this Order, the public docket reflects that the Plaintiff has yet to file complete proof of service of the Defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(2). The Court directs the Plaintiff's attention to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and Local Civil Rule 5.3. It is hereby ordered that, by no later than August 31, 2020, the Plaintiff must either cause process to be served upon the Defendant and file complete proof of service with the Court or establish good cause for the failure to do so. Failure to make such filings will result in dismissal of this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/31/2020. (lctnm2)
June 10, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Sandor Anthony Callahan on behalf of CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Callahan, Sandor)
June 10, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren R. Goldman on behalf of CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Goldman, Lauren)
June 9, 2020 Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 6/3/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/2/2020. (Pincus, Andrew)
June 8, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Douglas Allen Smith on behalf of CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Smith, Douglas)
June 8, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John Nadolenco, I on behalf of CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Nadolenco, John)
June 4, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Douglas A. Smith, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7194006. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Douglas A. Smith, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pincus, Andrew)
June 4, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- John Nadolenco, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7193990. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John Nadolenco, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pincus, Andrew)
June 4, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Lauren R. Goldman, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7193965. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Lauren R. Goldman, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pincus, Andrew)
June 4, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Sandor A. Callahan, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7193928. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sandor A. Callahan, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pincus, Andrew)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting the #6 , #7 , #8 , and #9 Motions for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 6/4/2020. (lctnm2)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 6/3/2020. (lctnm2)
June 3, 2020 Filing 4 Case randomly reassigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. Judge Dabney L. Friedrich is no longer assigned to the case. (ztnr)
June 3, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb)
June 3, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (zsb)
June 2, 2020 Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY (Pincus, Andrew)
June 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DONALD J. TRUMP ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7185996) filed by CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons - Trump, #3 Summons - Barr, #4 Summons - US Attorney)(Pincus, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY v. TRUMP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY & TECHNOLOGY
Represented By: Andrew John Pincus
Represented By: Sandor Anthony Callahan
Represented By: Lauren R. Goldman
Represented By: Douglas Allen Smith
Represented By: John Nadolenco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?