WYLIE v. SAMUEL et al
EMMANUEL QUENTIN WYLIE |
DAVID SAMUEL and UNKNOWN OWNERS |
1:2020cv01534 |
June 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable; Sent to Emmanuel Quentin Wylie; Type of Document Returned: Transfer Order #4 . (zmc) |
Receipt on 07/10/2020 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 2:20-mc-50806 sent by Eastern District of Michigan. (zrdj) |
Filing 5 Case transferred to the USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan, pursuant to the Court Order entered 06/16/2020. Sent to Court via Electronically. (zrdj) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Eastern District of Michigan. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 7/6/2020. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 6/16/2020. (adh, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE WAIVING Service by U.S. Marshal by EMMANUEL QUENTIN WYLIE. (zmd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by EMMANUEL QUENTIN WYLIE. (zmd) |
Filing 1 PETITION TO ENFORCE ARBITRATION AWARD against DAVID SAMUEL, UNKNOWN OWNERS filed by EMMANUEL QUENTIN WYLIE. (Attachments: #1 Vestment/Divestment Judgment, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmd) |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 6/9/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.