MONTEJO et al v. POMPEO et al
MARY SHENNETTE EBOL MONTEJO, JOHNNETTE EBOL MONTEJO and SHERWIN REY QUIJANO MONTEJO |
MIKE POMPEO, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II, JOHN C. LAW, SUNG KIM, WILLIAM P. BARR, CHAD F. WOLF, MARIK STRING and CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY |
1:2020cv01561 |
June 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Carl J Nichols |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on June 15, 2020. (lccjn1) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS (9) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH THOMAS CUCCINELLI, II, SUNG KIM, JOHN C. LAW, MIKE POMPEO, MARIK STRING, CHAD F. WOLF, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (adh, ) |
Filing 2 ERRATA re Summonses by JOHNNETTE EBOL MONTEJO, MARY SHENNETTE EBOL MONTEJO, SHERWIN REY QUIJANO MONTEJO #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by SHERWIN REY QUIJANO MONTEJO, JOHNNETTE EBOL MONTEJO, MARY SHENNETTE EBOL MONTEJO. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7227220) filed by MARY SHENNETTE EBOL MONTEJO, SHERWIN REY QUIJANO MONTEJO, JOHNNETTE EBOL MONTEJO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.