ROSE v. BROOKINGS INSTITUTION LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE et al
| RICHARD ROSE |
| THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and BROOKINGS INSTITUTION LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE |
| 1:2020cv01627 |
| June 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Dabney L Friedrich |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Defendant The Brookings Institution Long Term Disability Coverage by PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Costantino, Christine) |
Filing 3
STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on June 22, 2020. (lcdlf2)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION LONG TERM DISABILITY COVERAGE, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7251455) filed by RICHARD ROSE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Clark, Denise) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
