MARR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TABITHIA MARR |
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
1:2020cv01749 |
June 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Trevor N McFadden |
Deborah A Robinson |
Civil Rights: Other |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Porter, Veronica) |
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 6/30/20. (Houck, Carolyn) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 6/30/2020. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 7/21/2020. (Houck, Carolyn) |
CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson for full case management up to but excluding trial, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.2. (zsb) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 6/29/2020. (lctnm3) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
MINUTE ORDER REFERRING CASE to a Magistrate Judge, to be assigned at random by the Clerk's Office, for full case management up to but excluding trial, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.2. This includes, with respect to any potentially dispositive motion, the preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3. The parties are reminded that, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.1, they may consent to the assignment of this action to a magistrate judge for all purposes, including trial; consent of the presiding judge is not necessary. It is further ORDERED that any future filings related to this matter shall include the initials of the presiding judge and the magistrate judge following the case number in the caption. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 6/29/2020. (lctnm3) |
Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7275200) filed by TABITHIA MARR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons AG, #3 Summons Mayor, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 Exhibit 2)(Houck, Carolyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MARR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TABITHIA MARR | |
Represented By: | Carolyn W. Houck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
Represented By: | Veronica A. Porter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.