ALEXANDER v. CARVAJAL et al
| MORRIS ALEXANDER |
| MICHAEL CARVAJAL, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSE BELL and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE |
| 1:2020cv01897 |
| July 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Receipt on 08/21/2020 of Electronic Transfer. Other Court Number 8:20-cv-02420 sent by District of Maryland. (zrdj) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred to the USDC for the District of Maryland, pursuant to the Court Order entered 07/29/2020. Sent to Court via electronically. (zsb) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the District of Maryland.. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 8/18/2020. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 7/28/2020. (adh, )
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by MORRIS ALEXANDER. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MORRIS ALEXANDER. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JESSE BELL, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS filed by MORRIS ALEXANDER. (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 7/13/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
