KASIREDDY v. WOLF et al
| RITHVIK R. KASIREDDY |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF and KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II |
| 1:2020cv01927 |
| July 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Carl J Nichols |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by Joseph F. Carilli, Jr on behalf of All Defendants Substituting for attorney Alan Burch (Carilli, Joseph) |
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Carl J. Nichols on August 14, 2020. (lccjn3)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alan Burch on behalf of All Defendants (Burch, Alan) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7351206) filed by RITHVIK R KASIREDDY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT LIST, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #3 Exhibit EXHBIT B, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET, #6 Summons SUMMONS ATT GEN, #7 Summons SUMMONS_CUCCINELLI, #8 Summons SUMMONS US ATT, #9 Summons SUMMONS-WOLF)(Jeelani, Hashim) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Carl J. Nichols. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
