MORGAN v. SAUL
Plaintiff: KIM MORGAN
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Case Number: 1:2020cv02072
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: G Michael Harvey
Referring Judge: Amy Berman Jackson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 08/20/2020., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/20/2020. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/19/2020.) (zjf)
August 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General, sent to the U.S. Marshals Service (adh, )
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE. The Court has determined that this action should be referred to a magistrate judge for full case management, up to but excluding trial, pursuant to L.Cv.R. 72.3. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is referred to a magistrate judge to be assigned, beginning immediately. See Order for complete details. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 8/14/200. (lcabj3)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE RANDOMLY REFERRED to Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey for full case management. (zsb)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (adh, )
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall assign this case to a District Judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/7/20.(psu1)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KIM MORGAN (adh, )
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL filed by KIM MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(adh, )
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 7/29/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (adh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MORGAN v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KIM MORGAN
Represented By: Stephen F. Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?