REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY et al
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Defendant: OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Case Number: 1:2020cv02092
Filed: July 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Randolph D Moss
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gunita Singh on behalf of REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS (Singh, Gunita)
September 16, 2020 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Modify the Time for an Initial Scheduling Conference by OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Molen, Kathleene)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Defendants' unopposed motion to reschedule the initial scheduling conference #8 , the motion is hereby GRANTED. The scheduling conference previously set for October 13, 2020 at 11:15 a.m. is VACATED and RESCHEDULED for October 13, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. to take place telephonically. The parties can obtain a teleconference number and access code from the deputy clerk prior to the conference. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/16/2020. (lcrdm1)
September 10, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Alexander Marshall on behalf of REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS (Marshall, Adam)
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER: It is ORDERED that, on or before October 8, 2020, the parties shall confer and file a joint status report addressing (1) any documents still to be produced pursuant to FOIA; (2) an anticipated schedule for processing and producing any such documents; and (3) any substantive areas of disagreement between the parties. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall appear telephonically for an Initial Scheduling Conference on October 13, 2020, at 11:15 a.m., before Judge Randolph D. Moss. The parties can obtain a teleconference number and access code from the deputy clerk prior to the conference. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/10/2020. (lcrdm1)
September 9, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A & B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit F, #6 Exhibit G)(Molen, Kathleene)
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleene A. Molen on behalf of All Defendants (Molen, Kathleene)
August 17, 2020 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 8/10/20., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 8/10/2020. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 9/9/2020.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY served on 8/10/2020; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE served on 8/11/2020 (Attachments: #1 Affidavits of Mailing)(Townsend, KatieLynn)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives of the Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 8/4/2020. (lcrdm1)
July 31, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, )
July 31, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number BDCDC-7409635) filed by REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 Summons)(Townsend, KatieLynn)
July 31, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (adh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS v. OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Represented By: Kathleene A. Molen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Represented By: Kathleene A. Molen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Represented By: KatieLynn Boyd Townsend
Represented By: Gunita Singh
Represented By: Adam Alexander Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?