GALVIN v. GRAVES
| ELIZABETH W GALVIN and ELIZABETH W. GALVIN |
| DEAN GRAVES |
| 1:2020cv02239 |
| August 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Ketanji Brown Jackson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives, and parties and counsel should pay particular attention to the Court's instructions for briefing motions and filing exhibits. Failure to adhere to this Order may, when appropriate, result the imposition of sanctions and/or sua sponte denial of non-conforming motions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 8/19/2020. (jag)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to DEAN GRAVES. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by ELIZABETH W GALVIN. Case related to Case No. 19-cv-2483. (Cunningham, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT 20-2239 against DEAN GRAVES with Jury Demand p ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7466286) filed by ELIZABETH W GALVIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Cunningham, Paul) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
