FRENCH v. SAUL
DWAYNE E. FRENCH |
ANDREW M. SAUL |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
1:2020cv02248 |
August 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Dabney L Friedrich |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David F. Chermol on behalf of DWAYNE E. FRENCH (Chermol, David) |
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of David Chermol. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Clic k for instructions. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 5, 2020. (lcdlf2) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- David Chermol, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7553218. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by DWAYNE E. FRENCH (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit)(Shea, Stephen) |
Filing 3 STANDARD ORDER for Civil Cases. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on August 17, 2020. (lcdlf2) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to ANDREW M. SAUL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Case Assigned to Judge Dabney L. Friedrich. (adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7468688) filed by DWAYNE E. FRENCH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Shea, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.