MADDALI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Plaintiff: VENKATA RAVICHANDRA MADDALI
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Case Number: 1:2020cv02504
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Presiding Judge: Thomas F Hogan
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2020 Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 9/21/2020 (Rosen, Adam)
October 8, 2020 Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 9/21/2020 (Rosen, Adam)
October 8, 2020 Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/22/2020. (Rosen, Adam)
October 8, 2020 Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/22/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/21/2020. (Rosen, Adam)
September 9, 2020 Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc)
September 9, 2020 Case Assigned to Judge Thomas F. Hogan. (zsb)
September 8, 2020 Filing 2 REDACTED DOCUMENT- Exhibit to Complaint, ECF No. 1 to #1 Complaint,, Redacted Exhibit C to replace Exhibit C, ECF No. 1-4 by VENKATA RAVICHANDRA MADDALI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C (Redacted))(Rosen, Adam)
September 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7563658) filed by VENKATA RAVICHANDRA MADDALI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons for U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #7 Summons for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #8 Summons for U.S. Attorney General William Barr, #9 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney)(Rosen, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MADDALI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VENKATA RAVICHANDRA MADDALI
Represented By: Adam J. Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?