CONSUMER WATCHDOG v. ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
| CONSUMER WATCHDOG |
| ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. |
| 1:2020cv02526 |
| September 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| James E Boasberg |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles Wood on behalf of ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Wood, Charles) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Travis G. LeBlanc on behalf of ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (LeBlanc, Travis) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Powell on behalf of CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Powell, Benjamin) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerald S. Flanagan on behalf of CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Flanagan, Gerald) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Aarti Reddy on behalf of ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Reddy, Aarti) |
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Mediation by CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Scharg, Ari) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Theo Benjamin on behalf of CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Benjamin, Theo) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Edelson on behalf of CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Edelson, Jay) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Ari Scharg on behalf of CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Scharg, Ari) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 12/7/2020. Case Stayed. (znbn) |
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #18 Motion to Stay. The Court ORDERS that: 1) the case and any applicable deadlines are hereby STAYED; 2) Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended from October 9, 2020, until thirty days after the stay is lifted; and 3) the parties shall submit a Joint Status Report to update the Court on the mediation and the continued propriety of the stay no later than December 7, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 10/7/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Aarti Reddy, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7639931. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aarti Reddy in support of Motion to Appear PHV, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hartnett, Kathleen) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of AARTI REDDY. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/25/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Theo Benjamin, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7630304. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenfield, Harvey) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jay Edelson, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7630289. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenfield, Harvey) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Jerry Flanagan, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7630254. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenfield, Harvey) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Benjamin Powell, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7630228. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenfield, Harvey) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Ari Scharg, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7630198. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenfield, Harvey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Harvey Rosenfield on behalf of CONSUMER WATCHDOG (Rosenfield, Harvey) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of THEO J. BENJAMIN. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of ARI J. SCHARG. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #12 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of JAY EDELSON. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of BENJAMIN POWELL. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of JERRY FLANAGAN. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael G. Rhodes on behalf of ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Rhodes, Michael) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of MICHAEL G. RHODES. Counsel should register for e-filing via PACER and file a notice of appearance pursuant to LCvR 83.6(a). #Click for instructions. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/16/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Michael G. Rhodes, Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ADCDC-7595170. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael G. Rhodes in support of Motion to Appear PHV, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hartnett, Kathleen) |
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hartnett, Kathleen) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING Consent #5 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court ORDERS that Defendant shall file its Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by October 9, 2020. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/11/2020. (lcjeb1)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due by 10/9/2020. (znbn) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. re #1 Notice of Removal,, #2 LCvR 26.1 Certificate of Disclosure - Corporate Affiliations/Financial Interests . (Hartnett, Kathleen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel re #1 Notice of Removal. (zmd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Hartnett, Kathleen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2020 CA 003516 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADCDC-7571397 filed by ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Documents from Superior Court (Complaint, Civil Information Sheet, Summons, and Initial Order) Served on Zoom, #2 Exhibit B Copy of Notice to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit C Copy of Notice to State Court, #4 Exhibit D Documents from Superior Court (All Filings Not Included with Exhibit A), #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hartnett, Kathleen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
