CHAUDHRY et al v. POMPEO et al
| SANA SAEED CHAUDHRY and HASAN SAJJAD |
| MIKE POMPEO, CONN SCHRADER, PAUL W. JONES, CARL C. RISCH and WILLIAM P. BARR |
| 1:2020cv02535 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Timothy J Kelly |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Brenda A. Gonzalez Horowitz on behalf of All Defendants (Gonzalez Horowitz, Brenda) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (6) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, PAUL W. JONES, MIKE POMPEO, CARL C. RISCH, CONN SCHRADER, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/16/2020. (lctjk1)
|
| Case assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly. (zmc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against ALL DEFENDANTS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7575665) filed by SANA SAEED CHAUDHRY, HASAN SAJJAD. (Attachments: #1 EXHIBIT LIST, #2 EXHIBIT A, #3 EXHIBIT B, #4 EXHIBIT C, #5 CIVIL COVER SHEET, #6 SUMMONS BARR, #7 SUMMONS JONES, #8 SUMMONS POMPEO, #9 SUMMONS RISCH, #10 SUMMONS SCHRADER, #11 SUMMONS US ATTORNEY)(Jeelani, Hashim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
