WASHINGTON BLADE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
| WASHINGTON BLADE and CHRIS JOHNSON |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR |
| 1:2020cv02591 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Randolph D Moss |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER: Upon consideration of Parties' status report, Dkt. #9 , it is hereby ORDERED that the Initial Scheduling Conference set to take place on November 17, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. It is further ORDERED that Parties shall file a further joint status report on or before January 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/11/2020. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Brudy-Everett, Kristin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Gunita Singh on behalf of CHRIS JOHNSON, WASHINGTON BLADE (Singh, Gunita) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Alexander Marshall on behalf of CHRIS JOHNSON, WASHINGTON BLADE (Marshall, Adam) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: It is ORDERED that, on or before November 10, 2020, the parties shall confer and file a joint status report addressing (1) any documents still to be produced pursuant to FOIA; (2) an anticipated schedule for processing and producing any such documents; and (3) any substantive areas of disagreement between the parties. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall appear telephonically for an Initial Scheduling Conference on November 17, 2020, at 10:30 a.m., before Judge Randolph D. Moss. The parties can obtain a teleconference number and access code from the deputy clerk prior to the conference. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 10/22/2020. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.(Brudy-Everett, Kristin) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/21/2020. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 10/21/2020.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/21/20., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR served on 9/21/2020 (Townsend, KatieLynn) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives set forth in the attached Standing Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/16/2020. (lcrdm1)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by WASHINGTON BLADE (Townsend, KatieLynn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7593311) filed by WASHINGTON BLADE, CHRIS JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons)(Townsend, KatieLynn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Randolph D. Moss. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
