CHRISTIAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: PATRICK CHRISTIAN
Defendant: VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH CAROLINA
Case Number: 1:2020cv02666
Filed: September 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 USCA Case Number 20-5308 for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by PATRICK CHRISTIAN. (zmd)
October 14, 2020 Filing 6 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed (Memorandum Opinion), and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The fee was not paid because it was filed in forma pauperis re #5 Notice of Appeal. (zmd)
October 9, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Order Dismissing Pro Se Case, #3 Memorandum & Opinion by PATRICK CHRISTIAN. Fee Status: IFP. (zmd)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/24/2020. (zmd)
October 6, 2020 Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 9/24/2020. (zmd)
September 18, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PATRICK CHRISTIAN. (zmd)
September 18, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA with Jury Demand filed by PATRICK CHRISTIAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Through P, #2 Appendix, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (zmd)
September 18, 2020 Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 9/18/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHRISTIAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIRGINIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICK CHRISTIAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?