AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES v. FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL et al
| AFGE COUNCIL 222 and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES |
| FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL and MARK ANTHONY CARTER |
| 1:2020cv02683 |
| September 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Richard J Leon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0701 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/26/2020., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/26/2020. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/25/2020.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Service of Defendant FSIP, #2 Affidavit Service on FLRA, #3 Affidavit Service on Mark Anthony Carter, #4 Affidavit Service of Attorney General)(Sanghvi, Rushab)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 11/4/2020. (lcrjl2)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Catherine Blackadar on behalf of All Defendants (Blackadar, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. MARK ANTHONY CARTER served on 10/21/2020; FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY served on 10/21/2020; FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL served on 10/21/2020 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Service of Defendant FLRA, #2 Affidavit Service of Defendant Mark Anthony Carter, #3 Affidavit Service of United States Attorney, #4 Affidavit Service of Attorney General)(Sanghvi, Rushab)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Noah Barnett Peters on behalf of MARK ANTHONY CARTER, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL (Peters, Noah)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca Jean Osborne on behalf of MARK ANTHONY CARTER, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL (Osborne, Rebecca)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to MARK ANTHONY CARTER, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmc)
|
|
Case assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (zmc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. Case related to Case No. 19-cv-1934. (zmc)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against MARK ANTHONY CARTER, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL (Fee Status:Filing Fee Waived) filed by AFGE COUNCIL 222. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Related Case Notice, #3 Exhibit Hud and Council 222 Term Decision, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(Sanghvi, Rushab)
|
|
Filing 1
ENTERED IN ERROR.....COMPLAINT against MARK ANTHONY CARTER, FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, FEDERAL SERVICE IMPASSES PANEL (Fee Status:Filing Fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7618929) filed by AFGE COUNCIL 222. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Related Case Notice, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Exhibit Decision in HUD and Council 222 Term Agreement)(Sanghvi, Rushab) Modified on 9/23/2020 (zmc). Modified on 9/29/2020 (zmc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
