BANSAL v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| VANDANA BANSAL |
| NIEVES CARDINALE, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, ROBERT COWAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, WILLIAM P. BARR and JOSEPH EDLOW |
| 1:2020cv02788 |
| October 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Trevor N McFadden |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by VANDANA BANSAL re #3 Order from U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. NIEVES CARDINALE served on 10/5/2020 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ROBERT COWAN served on 10/5/2020 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. JOSEPH EDLOW served on 10/5/2020 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II served on 10/5/2020 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY served on 10/5/2020 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 10/5/2020 (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 10/05/2020. (Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 10/5/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/4/2020. (Rosen, Adam) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER Establishing Procedures for Cases Before Judge Trevor N. McFadden. The parties are hereby ORDERED to read and comply with the directives in the attached standing order. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 10/1/2020. (lctnm3)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (8) Issued Electronically as to WILLIAM P. BARR, NIEVES CARDINALE, ROBERT COWAN, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, JOSEPH EDLOW, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM P. BARR, NIEVES CARDINALE, ROBERT COWAN, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, JOSEPH EDLOW, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7661719) filed by VANDANA BANSAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table, #2 Exhibit A (Redacted), #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Summons for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, #10 Summons for U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #11 Summons for U.S. Attorney General, #12 Summons for Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, USCIS, #13 Summons for Deputy Director for Policy, USCIS, #14 Summons for Director, National Benefits Center, USCIS, #15 Summons for Field Office Director, Hartford Field Office, USCIS, #16 Summons for Civil Process Clerk, U.S. Attorney)(Rosen, Adam) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. (zsb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
