SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| JAMIE DAVIS SMITH |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2020cv02881 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Amy Berman Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MINUTE ORDER. Per the parties' joint report submitted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LCvR 16.3(d), the following schedule is set in this case: Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees must be submitted by December 18, 2020; Defendant's response must be submitted by February 5, 2021; Plaintiff's reply must be submitted by February 19, 2021. If at any point, the parties agree that they would benefit from the assistance of a neutral mediator, they may notify chambers. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 11/13/2020. (lcabj1)
|
| Filing 7 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Houck, Carolyn) |
|
MINUTE ORDER. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and file a report by November 19, 2020 that contains the information called for by Local Civil Rule 16.3(c)(4) and (5) and a proposed schedule for further proceedings in this case. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 11/2/2020. (lcabj1)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Porter, Veronica) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 10/9/20. (Houck, Carolyn) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 10/9/2020. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 10/30/2020. (Houck, Carolyn) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Charles A. Sibert on behalf of JAMIE DAVIS SMITH (Sibert, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7690079) filed by JAMIE DAVIS SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons AG, #3 Summons Mayor, #4 Exhibit 1, #5 2)(Houck, Carolyn) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMIE DAVIS SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Charles A. Sibert |
| Represented By: | Carolyn W. Houck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | |
| Represented By: | Veronica A. Porter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
