SAID v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
| AHMED SHERIF HOSSAM SAID |
| KENNETH CUCCINELLI, MICHAEL KLINGER, CHAD WOLF and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
| 1:2020cv02898 |
| October 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (2) Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (eg) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Piston, Michael) Modified on 10/26/2020 to correct docket event/text (zjf). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to KENNETH CUCCINELLI, MICHAEL KLINGER, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHAD WOLF. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (zsb) |
| Filing 2 ERRATA (Corrected Civil Cover Sheet) by AHMED SHERIF HOSSAM SAID #1 Complaint, filed by AHMED SHERIF HOSSAM SAID. (Piston, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KENNETH CUCCINELLI, MICHAEL KLINGER, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, CHAD WOLF ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7696417) filed by AHMED SHERIF HOSSAM SAID. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Piston, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
