COLLECTOR'S COFFEE INC. et al v. DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP et al
COLLECTOR'S COFFEE INC., COLLECTORS CAFE INC. and MYKALAI KONTILAI |
DOES 1 - 10, MIHEER MHATRE, DUSTIN BROCKNER, DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP and ANDREW J. CERESNEY |
1:2020cv02988 |
October 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Reggie B Walton |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to DUSTIN BROCKNER, ANDREW J. CERESNEY, DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP, MIHEER MHATRE. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Filing 3 ERRATA filed by COLLECTOR'S COFFEE INC.(Lambert, George) Modified on 10/21/2020 to correct docket entry text (zsb). |
Case Assigned to Judge Reggie B. Walton. (zsb) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Complaint filed by COLLECTOR'S COFFEE INC.. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by COLLECTOR'S COFFEE INC.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons to Defendant Andrew Ceresney, #2 Supplement Summons to Defendant Dustin Brockner, #3 Supplement Summons to Defendant Miheer Mhatre)(Lambert, George) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT VERIFIED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7724965) filed by COLLECTOR'S COFFEE INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lambert, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.