CONNOR v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al
DONNA M. CONNOR and DONNA M. CONNER |
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and MARK HERRING |
1:2020cv03014 |
October 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING PRO SE CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Ordered that the application of the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, and her motion for appointed counsel #3 is DENIED. This is a final appealable Order. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 11/4/2020. (zmd) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 11/4/2020. (zmd) |
Filing 3 MOTION requesting assigning complaint to the Civil Pro Bono Panel if informa pauperis status is approved by DONNA M. CONNER (zmd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DONNA M. CONNOR (zmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA filed by DONNA M. CONNOR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 through 7, #2 Summation for Pictures or Video) (zmd) Modified on 10/23/2020 (znmw). |
Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 10/18/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.