CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION v. HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC.
| CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION |
| THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC. and HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC. |
| 1:2020cv03154 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Ketanji Brown Jackson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY to opposition to motion re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Courtesy Copy of Plaintiff CLP's Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Toxin Free USA v. Smuckers Complaint (selected pages), #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Hackman v. One Brands Complaint)(Oliver-Zhang, Julie) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in opposition to re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Proposed Order))(McGavran, A.) |
| Filing 8 ERRATA by CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to D.C. Superior Court, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A with corrected cover sheet, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to D.C. Superior Court)(Oliver-Zhang, Julie) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Complaint)(Oliver-Zhang, Julie) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion for Briefing Schedule. It is hereby ORDERED that the following briefing schedule is set in this matter: Plaintiff's motion to remand is due on or before 11/30/2020; Defendant's opposition thereto is due on or before 12/21/2020; and Plaintiff's reply in further support thereof is due on or before 1/4/2021. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is STAYED until further Order of this Court. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 11/20/2020. (jag)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Briefing Schedule by HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(McGavran, A.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie T. Oliver-Zhang on behalf of CLEAN LABEL PROJECT FOUNDATION (Oliver-Zhang, Julie) |
|
Filing 4
GENERAL ORDER AND GUIDELINES FOR CIVIL CASES BEFORE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON. The Court will hold the parties and counsel responsible for following these directives, and parties and counsel should pay particular attention to the Court's instructions for briefing motions and filing exhibits. Failure to adhere to this Order may, when appropriate, result the imposition of sanctions and/or sua sponte denial of non-conforming motions. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on 11/5/2020. (jag)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Counsel/Party re #1 Notice of Removal, (adh, ) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. (adh, ) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC. (McGavran, A.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the District of Columbia, case number 2020 CA 003607 B Filing fee $ 400, receipt number ADCDC-7780927 filed by THE HAIN CELESTIAL GROUP INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(McGavran, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
