MENJIVAR v. WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. et al
| ROBERTO MENJIVAR |
| ABDULLA SULTAN, FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA and WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. doing business as WOODLEY CAFE |
| 1:2020cv03311 |
| November 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna R. Margolis on behalf of FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA, ABDULLA SULTAN, WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. (Margolis, Anna) (Main Document 10 replaced on 12/13/2020) (zjf). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher L. LaFon on behalf of FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA, ABDULLA SULTAN, WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. (LaFon, Christopher) (Main Document 9 replaced on 12/13/2020) (zjf). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Howard Rome on behalf of FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA, ABDULLA SULTAN, WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. (Rome, Scott) (Main Document 8 replaced on 12/13/2020) (zjf). |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant Answer Or Otherwise Response To The Complaint due by 1/25/2021. (mac) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA, ABDULLA SULTAN, WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rome, Scott) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Though Defendant failed to comply with this Court's "Motions for Extension of Time" requirements as indicated in the Court's Standing Order, ECF No. #2 at 7 ("Absent extenuating circumstances, motions for... scheduling change[s] must be filed THREE business days prior to the scheduled... deadline...."), Defendant has provided good cause as Defendant's counsel was only retained on December 8, 2020 and immediately filed the request for an extension. See ECF No. #7 at 1. Defendant shall file its answer or otherwise respond by no later than January 25, 2021. However, parties should be aware that the Court will view further extensions, in violation of the Court's Standing Order with disfavor. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 12/9/2020. (lcegs2)
|
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC. served on 11/25/2020, answer due 12/16/2020 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. ABDULLA SULTAN served on 11/19/2020, answer due 12/10/2020 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA served on 11/19/2020, answer due 12/10/2020 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to FARID AHMAD KHAIRZADA, ABDULLA SULTAN, WOODLEY CAFE PARTNERS, INC.. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 11/17/20. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7837208) filed by ROBERTO MENJIVAR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (3))(Zelikovitz, Justin) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
