SOROKIN v. POMPEO et al
YURIY SOROKIN |
CHAD F. WOLF, MICHAEL R. POMPEO and CATHERINE HOLT |
1:2020cv03373 |
November 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Rudolph Contreras |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. All Defendants (White, Kenneth) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/30/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/29/2021. (White, Kenneth) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General November 30, 2020. (White, Kenneth) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to CATHERINE HOLT, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(adh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ADCDC-7861509) filed by YURIY SOROKIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(White, Kenneth) |
Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.