GUIRLANDO v. COHEN et al
| MARCO GUIRLANDO |
| UNION COUNTY JAIL, DERRICK DRISCOLL, DEANNA HOPSON, TIM GREER, ADAM W. COHEN, SHERRIE RICE and RICHARD MITCHAM |
| 1:2020cv03490 |
| November 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case transferred to the USDC for the Western District of Arkansas, pursuant to the Court Order entered 12/04/2020. Sent to Court via electronically. (zsb) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Western District of Arkansas. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 12/24/2020. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 12/4/2020. (adh, )
|
| Filing 3 PARTIAL PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by MARCO GUIRLANDO. (zmd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARCO GUIRLANDO. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADAM W. COHEN, DERRICK DRISCOLL, TIM GREER, DEANNA HOPSON, RICHARD MITCHAM, SHERRIE RICE, UNION COUNTY JAIL with Jury Demand filed by MARCO GUIRLANDO. (zmd) |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 11/24/2020. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
