SARWAR v. DOYLE DUPONT LLC
| SAM SARWAR and SAIM SARWAR |
| DOYLE DUPONT LLC |
| 1:2020cv03648 |
| December 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by SAIM SARWAR re #5 Affidavit for Default, #6 MOTION for Entry of Default (Gillespie, Tristan) |
| Filing 6 WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO NOTICE FILED ON 1/18/2021.....MOTION for Entry of Default by SAIM SARWAR (Attachments: #1 proposed order)(Gillespie, Tristan); Modified on 1/21/2021 (ztth). |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT by SAIM SARWAR. (Gillespie, Tristan) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/21/2021) (znmw). |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DOYLE DUPONT LLC served on 12/16/2020, answer due 1/6/2021 (Gillespie, Tristan) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by DOYLE DUPONT LLC.(Donkor, Patricia) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (1) Issued Electronically as to DOYLE DUPONT LLC. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOYLE DUPONT LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-7953996) filed by SAM SARWAR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Gillespie, Tristan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
