NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
| NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE |
| DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
| 1:2020cv03649 |
| December 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Emmet G Sullivan |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by DEPARTMENT OF STATE.(Peterson, Benton) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Defendant Answer Or Otherwise Response To The Complaint due by 2/11/2021. (mac) |
MINUTE ORDER granting, nunc pro tunc, #7 defendant's unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The defendant shall file its answer or other response to the complaint by no later than February 11, 2021. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 2/5/2021. (lcegs2)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File by DEPARTMENT OF STATE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peterson, Benton) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/22/2021) (zjf). (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/22/2021) (zjf). |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/22/2020. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 1/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Mailing)(Sobel, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Benton Gregory Peterson on behalf of DEPARTMENT OF STATE (Peterson, Benton) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: The parties are directed to read the attached Standing Order Governing Civil Cases Before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in its entirety upon receipt. The parties are hereby ORDERED to comply with the directives in the attached Standing Order. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 12/17/20. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1) (mac)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons 2, #2 Summons 3, #3 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE (adh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive Relief against DEPARTMENT OF STATE ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-7954029) filed by NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons State, #3 Summons US Attorney, #4 Summons Attorney General, #5 Rule 7.1 Certificate)(Sobel, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (adh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF STATE | |
| Represented By: | Benton Gregory Peterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE | |
| Represented By: | David L. Sobel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
